Fine-tuning LLM for Prediction/Classification

ok
type
Post
status
Published
date
May 21, 2025
slug
embeddings2
summary
Part of research for Embedding Project
tags
LLM
category
icon
password
comment
publish date
😀
Fine-tuning LLM for Prediction/Classification

1. Define Your Task & Labels

  1. Task type
      • Classification: e.g. “Low/Medium/High” leadership score (categorical)
      • Regression: e.g. a continuous 1–10 performance rating
  1. Label schema
      • Decide on granularity (3 classes vs. 5 vs. continuous)
      • Ensure consistency: have at least 20–30 examples per class to avoid imbalance

2. Data Preparation

  1. Transcript cleaning
      • Remove filler tokens, normalize speaker labels (“CEO: …”, “Audience Q:”); strip timestamps if needed.
  1. Segmentation
      • If full transcript > model’s max‐tokens (e.g. 2k–4k), split into coherent chunks (e.g. per Q&A segment or per minute of speech).
      • Decide whether to classify each chunk then aggregate vs. treat entire transcript (with sliding window + voting).
  1. Input formatting
      • Prompt–Completion pairs (for causal models):
        • Sequence classification (for encoder–decoder or encoder‐only models): pack transcript into input_ids, append a special classification token ([CLS]), attach a linear head.
    1. Dataset splitting
        • Train/Val/Test: e.g. 70/15/15
        • Stratify by label to keep balanced splits

    3. Choose Your Fine-Tuning Approach

    1. Full Fine-Tuning
        • Unfreeze all weights; add a classification head (linear + softmax or linear for regression).
        • ✅ Best performance if you have ≥1k labeled examples.
        • ⚠️ High GPU/memory cost; risk of catastrophic forgetting.
    1. Parameter-Efficient Tuning
        • Adapters (e.g. Houlsby adapters): insert small bottleneck layers between transformer blocks.
        • LoRA (Low-Rank Adapters): freeze original weights; learn low-rank updates.
        • Prefix / Prompt-Tuning: learn a small set of “soft prompts” prepended to input.
        • ✅ Drastically fewer trainable params, cheaper; you can switch tasks fast.
        • ⚠️ May need more careful hyperparam tuning.

    4. Training Setup

    1. Framework: Hugging Face Accelerate / PyTorch Lightning / DeepSpeed
    1. Hyperparameters
        • Learning rate: 1e-5–5e-5 (lower for full fine-tune, slightly higher for LoRA)
        • Batch size: as large as fits (use gradient accumulation if needed)
        • Epochs: 3–5 for classification; monitor val loss for early stopping
        • Weight decay: 0.01–0.1 to regularize
    1. Loss function
        • Cross-Entropy for classification
        • MSE / MAE for regression
    1. Optimization tricks
        • Grad-accumulation to simulate larger batches
        • Mixed precision (FP16) to save memory/speed up
        • Warm-up steps ≈ 10% of total steps, then linear decay

    5. Handling Long Transcripts

    1. Chunk + Aggregate
        • Fine-tune on 1–2 k token chunks, predict per chunk, then aggregate (majority vote or average score).
    1. Hierarchical Models
        • First encode chunks to embeddings, then feed those embeddings into a smaller classifier (e.g. Bi-LSTM or MLP).
    1. Memory-Efficient Models
        • Use models with extended context (Longformer, BigBird) if you want to feed the whole transcript in one go.

    6. Evaluation & Metrics

    1. Classification
        • Accuracy, Precision/Recall/F1 per class
        • Confusion matrix to spot bias (e.g. always predicting “High”)
    1. Regression
        • MAE, RMSE, R²
        • Correlation with human raters
    1. Robustness checks
        • Test on unseen speakers or different conference styles
        • Ablation: remove Q&A vs. opening remarks
     
     
    💡
    Loading...

    © Yuki Leong 2021-2026